[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080213090159.GA21614@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:01:59 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ata crash] Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc1
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> btw this one was featured in the weekly bug top 10.. it's a rather
> popular thing to happen.
i didnt get very far with bisection. .23 definitely did not crash and
booted up fine - but it produced the "Bad IO ..." messages - so my
automated bisector scripts which turned that warning into a crash&reboot
honed in on the wrong (and probably uninteresting) area. .24 had
timeouts but no crash. .25-rc1 had the crash. So it seems like multiple
IDE regressions building up a concert of failures here, and it's hard to
sort them out.
If an IDE/PATA/SATA person could take a look at the various logs i
posted and could suggest the most efficient way to proceed it could save
me from having to blindly spend hours on this problem.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists