linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/5] printk: keep log level on multiline messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:09:29 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	jeff@...zik.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	jengelh@...putergmbh.de, matthew@....cx, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	daniel.ritz-ml@...ssonline.ch, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] printk: keep log level on multiline messages

When printing multiline messages, printk() resets log level to
default_message_loglevel after the first line.  This changes log level
unexpectedly when printing multiline messages.

For example, libata error messages are printed like the following.

<3>ata8.00: cmd 60/01:00:e0:71:02/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 512 in
<4>         res 40/00:34:de:71:02/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)

This patch makes printk use the log level of the last line if the
current line doesn't specify log level explicitly.

While at it, separate out is_loglevel() test.  This will be used by
later changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
---
 kernel/printk.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 419cd47..2317ec8 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -614,6 +614,11 @@ asmlinkage int printk(const char *fmt, ...)
 	return r;
 }
 
+static int is_loglevel(const char *p)
+{
+	return p[0] == '<' && p[1] >= '0' && p[1] <= '7' && p[2] == '>';
+}
+
 asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, va_list args)
 {
 	/* cpu currently holding logbuf_lock */
@@ -625,10 +630,11 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, va_list args)
 	static int log_level_unknown = 1;
 	static char printk_buf[PRINTK_BUF_LEN + sizeof(overflow_tag) - 1];
 
+	int last_lv = default_message_loglevel;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int printed_len = 0;
 	int this_cpu;
-	char *p;
+	const char *p;
 
 	boot_delay_msec();
 
@@ -682,47 +688,37 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk(const char *fmt, va_list args)
 	for (p = printk_buf; *p; p++) {
 		if (log_level_unknown) {
                         /* log_level_unknown signals the start of a new line */
+			int lv = last_lv;
+
+			if (is_loglevel(p)) {
+				lv = p[1] - '0';
+				p += 3;
+				printed_len -= 3;
+			}
+
+			emit_log_char('<');
+			emit_log_char(lv + '0');
+			emit_log_char('>');
+			printed_len += 3;
+
 			if (printk_time) {
-				int loglev_char;
 				char tbuf[50], *tp;
 				unsigned tlen;
 				unsigned long long t;
 				unsigned long nanosec_rem;
 
-				/*
-				 * force the log level token to be
-				 * before the time output.
-				 */
-				if (p[0] == '<' && p[1] >='0' &&
-				   p[1] <= '7' && p[2] == '>') {
-					loglev_char = p[1];
-					p += 3;
-					printed_len -= 3;
-				} else {
-					loglev_char = default_message_loglevel
-						+ '0';
-				}
 				t = cpu_clock(printk_cpu);
 				nanosec_rem = do_div(t, 1000000000);
-				tlen = sprintf(tbuf,
-						"<%c>[%5lu.%06lu] ",
-						loglev_char,
+				tlen = sprintf(tbuf, "[%5lu.%06lu] ",
 						(unsigned long)t,
 						nanosec_rem/1000);
 
 				for (tp = tbuf; tp < tbuf + tlen; tp++)
 					emit_log_char(*tp);
 				printed_len += tlen;
-			} else {
-				if (p[0] != '<' || p[1] < '0' ||
-				   p[1] > '7' || p[2] != '>') {
-					emit_log_char('<');
-					emit_log_char(default_message_loglevel
-						+ '0');
-					emit_log_char('>');
-					printed_len += 3;
-				}
 			}
+
+			last_lv = lv;
 			log_level_unknown = 0;
 			if (!*p)
 				break;
-- 
1.5.2.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/