[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080213093225.GA16985@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:26 +0200
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: jdmason@...zu.us, bzolnier@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
discuss@...-64.org
Subject: Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:16:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Why does the calgary driver need this? Can we just use
> pci_get_device() instead? Why do you need to walk the device list
> backwards? Do you get false positives going forward?
It's not strictly needed, we used it for symmetry. Feel free to nuke
it and walk the list forward.
Cheers,
Muli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists