[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B2BC2C.80100@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:15:16 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
CC: vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark 45% regression
Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> volanoMark has 45% regression with kernel 2.6.25-rc1 on my both 8-core
> stoakley and 16-core Tigerton.
>
> I used bisect to locate below patch.
>
> commit 58e2d4ca581167c2a079f4ee02be2f0bc52e8729
> Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100
>
> sched: group scheduling, change how cpu load is calculated
>
>
>
> hackbench has about 30% regression on 16-core tigerton, but has about 10% improvement
> on 8-core stoakley.
>
> In addition, tbench has about 6% regression on my 8-core stoakley and
> 25% regression on 16-core stoakley. Some other benchmarks, like netperf/aim7
> also have some regression. I will verify if they are all related to the
> patch.
>
> -yanmin
Hi, Yamin,
Thanks for reporting the issue? Any chance we could getthe Oprofile output for
the run? The exact commandline and .config being used would also help.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists