[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080213110935.28689262@crazy>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:09:35 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Linux-tiny@...enic.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] x86: Configure out compilation of Simple Boot
Flag support
Le Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:29:58 +0100,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> a écrit :
> no strong feelings if the ACPI guys ack it - but i suspect the
> renaming of the function from acpi_parse_sbf to sbf_acpi_parse was
> unnecessary?
I rename acpi_parse_sbf() to sbf_acpi_parse() because the function was
moved from arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c, where pretty much all functions
are named acpi_*() to the file arch/x86/kernel/bootflag.c, where all
the functions are named sbf_*(). However, I don't mind reverting that
renaming, I just thought it was cleaner, but I have no strong opinion
on it.
Any thoughts about the duplicate call to
acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_BOOT, acpi_parse_sbf) ?
Thanks for your comments,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists