[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080213130601.GF6344@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:06:01 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: rdreier@...co.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange hang on ia64 with CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> I see nothing illegal in what cpu_clock() is doing, that's why I fixed
> the sparc64 per-cpu problem I ran into since sparc64 was doing the
> wrong thing when booted on a non-zero cpu.
okay. I'm just somewhat uneasy about potentially losing the ability to
printk. printk must stay simple and dependable. Maybe PRINTK_TIMESTAMPs
should be delayed to at the point when system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists