linux-kernel - Re: Upgrade to 2.6.24 breaks NFS service

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1202912119.11904.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:15:19 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade to 2.6.24 breaks NFS service


On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 08:58 +0000, Nix wrote:
> I upgraded from 2.6.23.10 to 2.6.24.2 yesterday, and found NFS service
> failing.
> 
> To be specific, all locks were blocking forever, with an endless flood
> of
> 
> Feb 12 22:53:10 loki notice: kernel: statd: server localhost not responding, timed out
> Feb 12 22:53:10 loki notice: kernel: lockd: cannot monitor esperi
> Feb 12 22:53:45 loki notice: kernel: statd: server localhost not responding, timed out
> Feb 12 22:53:45 loki notice: kernel: lockd: cannot monitor esperi
> Feb 12 22:54:20 loki notice: kernel: statd: server localhost not responding, timed out
> Feb 12 22:54:20 loki notice: kernel: lockd: cannot monitor esperi
> Feb 12 22:54:55 loki notice: kernel: statd: server localhost not responding, timed out
> Feb 12 22:54:55 loki notice: kernel: lockd: cannot monitor esperi
> Feb 12 22:55:20 esperi notice: kernel: lockd: server loki.wkstn.nix not responding, still trying
> 
> (esperi is a UML instance on the same machine, connected via a bridged
> TUN/TAP interface: the bridge, and network service to esperi and to the
> rest of the local net across that bridge, was fine.)
> 
> I'm currently using NFSv3 atop nfs-utils 1.1.0.33-gdd08789, with daemons
> being started in the suggested order (portmap, mountd, statd
> --no-notify, nfsd). This evening I'm going to try to upgrade to
> nfs-utils HEAD and see if this continues.

Nothing has changed w.r.t. the statd interface. My 2.6.24 nfsv3 machines
are working without a hitch.
Do 'rpcinfo' and 'netstat -p' show that rpc.statd is listening on a
privileged port?

Cheers
  Trond

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/