linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:13:42 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> MAINTAINERS is the most frequently patched file

Almost all of them merge perfectly, with no problems what-so-ever. And the 
merge conflicts, when they happen, are generally really trivial, and never 
cause any subtle run-time bugs even if they were to happen.

So in that sense, I think both MAINTAINERS and the deprecation schedule 
are totally uninteresting. Yes, they have merge conflicts. But those merge 
conflicts are really really easy to handle.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/