[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080212.171603.14132226.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:16:03 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, arjan@...radead.org, greg@...ah.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:37:42 -0800
> Well there's a case in point. rcupdate.h is not a part of networking, and
> it is random tree-wandering like this which causes me problems and which
> will cause Stephen problems.
>
> Now, I don't know which tree "owns" rcupdate.h but it ain't networking.
> Probably git-sched.
>
> Nothing in networking depends upon that change (which has a typo in the
> comment, btw) hence it can and should have gone through
> whichever-tree-owns-that-file.
>
> For Stephen's sake: please.
At least thie time I did make sure that change got posted to
linux-kernel and got properly reviewed by the de-facto maintainer
(Paul McKenney). :-)
I'll toss it.
But how do I do that using GIT without rebasing and without
having this ugly changeset and revert in there?
That's the thing I want answered, and although Al claims it does,
git cherry-pick does not seem to do what I want either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists