[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080213125820.26afea31.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:58:20 -0600
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
clameter@....com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag
David wrote:
> Yeah, it gets tricky.
If you can stand to read my code, look at that big patch I sent you
and Lee, dated "Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:24:02 -0600", under the Subject
of "Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice",
where I did this, keeping the 'policy' field unchanged in struct
mempolicy and adding additional fields for the (three, in my case)
new modes.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists