linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080213113241.4949e46a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:32:41 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, gregkh@...e.de, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:13:42 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Joe Perches wrote:
> > 
> > MAINTAINERS is the most frequently patched file
> 
> Almost all of them merge perfectly, with no problems what-so-ever. And the 
> merge conflicts, when they happen, are generally really trivial, and never 
> cause any subtle run-time bugs even if they were to happen.
> 
> So in that sense, I think both MAINTAINERS and the deprecation schedule 
> are totally uninteresting. Yes, they have merge conflicts. But those merge 
> conflicts are really really easy to handle.
> 

yup.  I'll often get conflicts and rejects in those files from the git
trees which I don't even bother fixing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/