linux-kernel - Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3138.1202932815@sora.hank.home>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:00:15 +0100
From:	Dirk GOUDERS <hank@...bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
cc:	bzolnier@...il.com, muli@...ibm.com, discuss@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	jdmason@...zu.us, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this? 

> Hm, so, to summarize:
>   - you needed this option many years ago to get a box to work properly
>   - you don't need this today
> 
> So, if the option went away, you would not be inconvenienced?

After having reanimated the old system and after comments of other
persons I would not be inconvenienced if the option went away.

The system indeed did not boot correctly without that option, because
the disks appeared in a wrong order.  On the other hand, I was able to
(re)install bootloaders (grub as well as lilo) and after that did not
need the option any more.  Unfortunately, after that I was not able to
reproduce the initial situation where the option was needed.

Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/