linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] remove rcu_assign_pointer(NULL) penalty with type/macro safety

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:00:24 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	shemminger@...tta.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] remove rcu_assign_pointer(NULL) penalty with type/macro safety

Hello!

This is an updated version of the patch posted last November:

	http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20071201.003721.cd6ff17c.en.html

This new version permits arguments with side effects, for example:

	rcu_assign_pointer(global_p, p++);

and also verifies that the arguments are pointers, while still avoiding
the unnecessary memory barrier when assigning NULL to a pointer.
This memory-barrier avoidance means that rcu_assign_pointer() is now only
permitted for pointers (not array indexes), and so this version emits a
compiler warning if the first argument is not a pointer.  I built a "make
allyesconfig" version on an x86 system, and received no such warnings.
If RCU is ever applied to array indexes, then the second patch in this
series should be applied, and the resulting rcu_assign_index() be used.

Given the rather surprising history of subtlely broken implementations of
rcu_assign_pointer(), I took the precaution of generating a full set of
test cases and verified that memory barriers and compiler warnings were
emitted when required.  I guess it is the simple things that get you...

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 rcupdate.h |   16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.24/include/linux/rcupdate.h linux-2.6.24-rap/include/linux/rcupdate.h
--- linux-2.6.24/include/linux/rcupdate.h	2008-01-24 14:58:37.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.24-rap/include/linux/rcupdate.h	2008-02-13 13:36:47.000000000 -0800
@@ -270,12 +270,20 @@ extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
  * structure after the pointer assignment.  More importantly, this
  * call documents which pointers will be dereferenced by RCU read-side
  * code.
+ *
+ * Throws a compiler warning for non-pointer arguments.
+ *
+ * Does not insert a memory barrier for a NULL pointer.
  */

-#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v)	({ \
-						smp_wmb(); \
-						(p) = (v); \
-					})
+#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v)	\
+	({ \
+		typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (v); \
+		\
+		if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || (_________p1 != NULL)) \
+			smp_wmb(); \
+		(p) = _________p1; \
+	})

 /**
  * synchronize_sched - block until all CPUs have exited any non-preemptive
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/