[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1202942550.18204.18.camel@brick>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:42:30 -0800
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] feature-removal: add documentation for exported
symbols going away
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 00:34 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:22:06PM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > +
> > +What: __inet_hash_connect
> > +Where: net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> > +When: 2.6.28
> > +Why: No in tree users
> > +
> > +---------------------------
> > +
> > +What: io_delay_type
> > +Where: arch/x86/kernel/io_delay.c
> > +When: 2.6.28
> > +Why: No in tree users
> > +
> > +---------------------------
> >...
>
> NAK.
>
> It's a well-known and documented fact that we not have a stable API for
> modules.
>
> And as long as we anyway break the modules API in so many other cases
> with each kernel release there's simply no point in not removing exports
> immediately.
>
> Oh, and for increasing the amount of nonsense even further, you should
> explain why unused exports that just sneaked into 2.6.25-rc1 must be
> shipped in 4 stable kernels before they can be removed.
>
Without comment on the validity of the exports themselves, I was more
interested in the principle of announcing these removals, and if it
was wanted.
Cheers,
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists