[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080213232248.GF12383@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:22:48 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: harvey.harrison@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
xemul@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] feature-removal: add documentation for exported
symbols going away
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:54:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:43:08 +0200
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > There's simply no point in treating the removal of exports differently
> > from the many other API breaks we have in each release.
>
> I have repeatedly and relatively patiently explained to you what the
> point is. Simply saying that there isn't one doesn't actually make
> it go away.
Yes, we had this when you insisted on the deprecation period for
sys_open which still brings me to explosion each time such topics come
up and brought you _very_ near at being the first person ever in my
killfile.
I don't get your point why bigger API changes should still be allowed
without any advance warning while removing an export should require
deprecation periods.
If you want to offer a stable API for external modules then please do
it completely and with all consequences.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists