[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1202869550.3137.182.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:25:50 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jeff@...zik.org,
arjan@...radead.org, greg@...ah.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 17:20 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> What would be really cool is if you could do the rebase thing, push
> that to a remote tree you were already pushing into and others could
> pull from that and all the right things happen.
>
> A rebase is just a series of events, and those could propagate to
> people who are pulling from the tree. I'm pretty sure GIT could
> support this.
Yes, this is exactly the feature I'm looking for. It would allow the
downstream users of a rebased tree to rebase themselves correctly.
All the information about the rebase is in the reflog ... it can't be
too difficult to pass it through on a pull and allow the downstream tree
to do the right thing.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists