[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080212183521.2c19e2a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:35:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] fib_trie: print statistics for multiple tables
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:50:45 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
> +/**
> + * hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu - iterate over rcu hlist after current point
> + * @tpos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
> + * @pos: the &struct hlist_node to use as a loop cursor.
> + * @member: the name of the hlist_node within the struct.
> + */
> +#define hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(tpos, pos, member) \
> + for (pos = (pos)->next; \
> + rcu_dereference(pos) && ({ prefetch(pos->next); 1;}) && \
> + ({ tpos = hlist_entry(pos, typeof(*tpos), member); 1;}); \
> + pos = pos->next)
Is the compiler allowed to look at a term such as
({ prefetch(pos->next); 1;})
and, when it is used as a truth value, say "hey, that's always true" and
then elide the call to prefetch()? We've no way of telling because this
remains gcc-specific territory, afaik.
(cc Paul for rcu stuff)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists