[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080214064119.GF17151@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:11:19 +0530
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc1 panics on boot
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:06:31PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:32:02PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Dhaval Giani
> > <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:08:42PM -0500, Chris Snook wrote:
> > > > Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > >> I am getting the following oops on bootup on 2.6.25-rc1
> > > > ...
> > > >> I am booting using kexec with maxcpus=1. It does not have any problems
> > > >> with maxcpus=2 or higher.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like another (the same?) kexec cpu numbering bug. Can you post/link
> > > > the entire dmesg from both a cold boot and a kexec boot so we can compare?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Don't think its a kexec bug. Get the same on cold boot. dmesg from kexec boot.
> >
> > how about without "crashkernel=64M@16M nmi_watchdog=2"
> >
> > also does intel cpu support nmi_watchdog=2?
> >
>
> Yes it does. I've used it to get some useful debug information. I will try
> that out.
>
Panics at same point.
--
regards,
Dhaval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists