[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080214074327.GD17552@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:43:27 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: pageexec@...email.hu
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: vmsplice exploits, stack protector and Makefiles
> --- linux-2.6.24.2/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_64 2008-01-24 23:58:37.000000000
> +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.24.2-pax/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_64 2008-02-13
> 11:36:14.000000000 +0100
> @@ -42,4 +42,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += early-quirks.o
> obj-y += topology.o
> obj-y += pcspeaker.o
>
> -CFLAGS_vsyscall_64.o := $(PROFILING) -g0
> +CFLAGS_vsyscall_64.o := $(PROFILING) -g0 -fno-stack-protector
> +CFLAGS_hpet.o := -fno-stack-protector
> +CFLAGS_tsc_64.o := -fno-stack-protector
We should use:
nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
+CFLAGS_vsyscall_64.o := $(PROFILING) -g0 $(nostackp)
+CFLAGS_hpet.o := $(nostackp)
+CFLAGS_tsc_64.o := $(nostackp)
(or somthing similar)
because we cannot rely on that all gcc versions has support
for -fno-stack-protector
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists