[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200802141311.43103.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:11:42 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@...e.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, muli@...ibm.com, discuss@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
jdmason@...zu.us, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> writes:
>
> > How does the patch below look? I didn't want to remove the whole config
> > option, as there is more to the logic than just the "reverse order"
> > stuff there.
>
> I think you miss Documentation - it's mentioned in ide.txt and
> kernel-parameters.txt,
+ drivers/ide/Kconfig
Greg, please update the patch (and add my S-o-B while at it).
Thanks,
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists