linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] markers: Fix build for MODULES=n.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080214143124.GA14777@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:31:24 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] markers: Fix build for MODULES=n.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:32:44AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Paul Mundt (lethal@...ux-sh.org) wrote:
> >   CC      kernel/marker.o
> > kernel/marker.c: In function 'marker_update_probes':
> > kernel/marker.c:627: error: too few arguments to function 'module_update_markers'
> > make[1]: *** [kernel/marker.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [kernel] Error 2
> > 
> > module_update_markers() doesn't take any arguments, update the MODULES=n
> > version of it to reflect that.
> > 
> 
> Hi Paul, thanks for submitting this. Adrian-the-roadrunner has been
> faster than you though. :) He already submitted this fix here :
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/714
> 
No worries, I was just tossing out stuff I hit with my randconfigs now
that things are slowing down. It's difficult to verify your own stuff
when the rest of the tree keeps breaking. It's good to know there are
other people doing similar tests ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/