[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080214155724.772744000@chello.nl>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:57:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] reworking load_balance_monitor
Hi,
Here the current patches that rework load_balance_monitor.
The main reason for doing this is to eliminate the wakeups the thing generates,
esp. on an idle system. The bonus is that it removes a kernel thread.
Paul, Gregory - the thing that bothers me most atm is the lack of
rd->load_balance. Should I introduce that (-rt ought to make use of that as
well) by way of copying from the top sched_domain when it gets created?
- peterz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists