lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:37:55 +0000
From:	Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
To:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] x86: use ELF format in compressed images.

On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 17:01 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 11:34 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 20:54 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > This allows other boot loaders such as the Xen domain builder the
> > > opportunity to extract the ELF file.
> > 
> > 	Right, Xen currently can't boot bzImage (it needs the ELF image) so you
> > still can't use the same kernel image on Xen as bare-metal.
> 
> I have a xen domain builder patch as well. I was waiting for the Linux
> side to gain some traction before putting it forward (I'd attach it now
> but it's at home on a laptop which is sleeping).

Yep, just want to highlight to people that your patches (or an
alternative) are needed before the same pv_ops kernel truly can be used
on bare-metal and Xen.

> > 	How about this?
> > 
> > +sed-offsets := -e 's/^00*/0/' \
> > +        -e 's/^\([0-9a-fA-F]*\) . \(input_data\|input_data_end\)$$/-D\2=0x\1 /p'
> > +
> > +$(obj)/header.o: AFLAGS_header.o += $(shell $(NM) $(obj)/compressed/vmlinux | sed -n $(sed-offsets))
> > +$(obj)/header.o: $(obj)/compressed/vmlinux FORCE
> 
> That's probably a neater way of doing it. Although the ".../header.o:
> AFLAGS_header.o" is redundant, either 
> 	header.o: AFLAGS += foo

With this, AFLAGS would apply to building when building the
prerequisites of header.o too, which you don't want

The make manual says:

  "when you define a target-specific variable that variable value is
   also in effect for all prerequisites of this target, and all their
   prerequisites"

> or
> 	AFLAGS_header.o += foo
> with the second being preferred in Linux Makefiles I think.

And with this, it would try and read vmlinux before it is built.

But, hmm, given the fact that the variable is defined when building
prerequisites, you'd think that even in my version AFLAGS would be
evaluated before building vmlinux.

Cheers,
Mark.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ