linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] bitmap relative operator for mempolicy extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802141206100.1041@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:06:53 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
cc:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, mel@....ul.ie,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	travis@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] bitmap relative operator for mempolicy extensions

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:

> You're saying the kernel should use these relative masks internally?

There is just some thoughts about this. Did not have time to look into the 
details. Mike?
 
> That means it would be impossible to run workloads that use the complete
> machine because you couldn't represent all nodes.

Not sure how they are addressing this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/