[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1203024381.3158.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:26:21 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: first tree
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 16:03 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Also, more trees please ... :-)
>
> Please add the 'NEXT' branch of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
>
> to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often.
>
> The 'master' branch of libata-dev.git always contains the base commit
> from torvalds/linux-2.6.git from which all other branches are based. I
> never ever commit to the 'master' branch, only update it from
> torvalds/linux-2.6.git.
>
>
> Andrew,
>
> I will continue to maintain the 'ALL' branch exactly as before. It may
> contain changes not suitable for 'NEXT', but suitable for -mm testing.
>
> In my new development process, things will almost always land in 'ALL'
> before 'NEXT'.
So does this indicate the meaning of upstream and upstream-fixes is
still the same? I always took upstream-fixes to be bug fixes for this
-rc and upstream as queued for the next merge window, in which case NEXT
would be the union of those two sets?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists