[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1202952946-10511-1-git-send-email-khilman@mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:35:46 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>
To: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.24-rt1] SMC91x: Use special_lock when CONFIG_PREEMPT_[HARD|SOFT]IRQS
The smc_special_locks should also be used when either softIRQs or hard
IRQs are preempted which may lead to the same problems as under SMP.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>
---
drivers/net/smc91x.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/smc91x.c
index f198c49..be62616 100644
--- a/drivers/net/smc91x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/smc91x.c
@@ -530,7 +530,8 @@ static inline void smc_rcv(struct net_device *dev)
}
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || \
+ defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_HARDIRQS)
/*
* On SMP we have the following problem:
*
--
1.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists