| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <fp08q7$jv0$1@ger.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:26:26 -0500 From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Driver removals Just a general thought on removing drivers in general, when a driver is removed because there's a better one, it would be good to have either a message which shows up at "make oldconfig" time, or a file listing the driver(s) which replace it. Half the resistance to removing drivers is finding what is supposed to replace the driver. For instance a list of all the drivers Adrian Bunk has suggested to replace sk98lin, so users have something better than searching the source code and/or LKML archive to find the next thing to try. In general, if a driver works and is being used, until it *needs* attention I see no reason to replace it. I don't agree that "it forces people to try the new driver" is a valid reason, being unmaintained is only a problem if it needs maintenance. I am not going to reopen that topic, I'm simply noting a general opposition to unfunded mandates, and requiring changes to kernel, module and/or rc.local config is just that. -- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists