[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080215070843.GA6975@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:08:43 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, torvalds@...l.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix left over EFI cache mapping problems
* Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 17:12 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > this is indeed a bug (we change the attributes for a larger area than
> > needed), but your fix is unclean. Find below a cleaner solution.
> >
> > Ying, if you agree with this fix could you please test and ACK it before
> > we push it to Linus? (this fix is also in the latest x86.git#mm)
>
> I think the patch following may be better, because it is possible that
> the EFI_PAGE_SHIFT and PAGE_SHIFT are different.
right now, EFI page size is 4096:
include/linux/efi.h:#define EFI_PAGE_SHIFT 12
i doubt we'll ever change PAGE_SIZE on x86 - ia64's variable lowlevel
pagesizes are not particularly useful IMO. I think we'll at most have
some generic kernel feature that allows a larger PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - but
on the lowlevel MMU level we'll always stay at 4K.
and i doubt EFI_PAGE_SHIFT would want to (ever) go away from 12 either.
So perhaps, at least as far as arch/x86/kernel/efi*.c files go, it would
be cleaner to just replace EFI_PAGE_SHIFT with PAGE_SHIFT and
EFI_PAGE_SIZE with PAGE_SIZE?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists