[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080215074009.GA4772@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:40:09 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH depend on BROKEN
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:33:06AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The pattern for making a config option on purpose not available is a
> > dependency on BROKEN.
> BROKEN says that what is selected by the cofig option
> is broken.
> This is not the case for DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH which is
> why it was made dependent on something else.
BROKEN is our pattern for "intentionally disabled".
I did really grep for UNDEFINED when I first saw it since it might as
well have been some kind of CONFIG_UNDEFINED "warn about undefined foobar".
> Sam
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists