| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47B5877E.8050309@bull.net> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:37:18 +0100 From: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@...l.net> To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 0/8] (resend) IPC: code rewrite Andi Kleen wrote: > pierre.peiffer@...l.net writes: > >> This is a resend of the first part of the patchset sent 2 weeks >> ago. This is the part about the IPC which (again) proposes to consolidate >> some part of the existing code. >> >> It does not change the behavior of the existing code, but >> improves it in term of readability and maintainability as it consolidates it >> a little. As there was no objection, I think you can include them in your >> -mm tree. >> >> The patchset applies on top of "2.6.24-mm1 + previous patches about >> IPC" sent the last days (ie Nadia's patches + mine). > > While I have not read everything in detail from a quick overview > the whole patch series looks like a nice and valuable cleanup to me. > > I was a bit sceptical about all the interface enhancements your original > patchkit had, but this one looks just fine. > Thanks Andi for spending time on this review. All kind of comments (positive or negative) are always welcome to make progress, but of course, I particularly appreciate such positive feedbacks ;) -- Pierre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists