linux-kernel - Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080215135848.GD7657@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:58:48 -0700
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
	bzolnier@...il.com, muli@...ibm.com, jdmason@...zu.us,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, discuss@...-64.org
Subject: Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:16:42PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> There are any number of things you can do when the system is booted, but 
> the only thing you can do when the system won't boot is use kernel boot 
> options.

Greg's not removing your option to boot the system using an old kernel
to set up a new kernel properly ;-)

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/