linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] ide: generic packet command representation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802151503580.30301@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:04:48 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
cc:	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ide: generic packet command representation


On Feb 12 2008 01:09, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
>> On a different note, i noticed ide-scsi might also need a cleanup
>> similar to the other drivers. It is next on my TODO list in case
>> you don't have anything with a higher prio.
>
>I was actually hoping that you'll continue unifying ATAPI handling...
>
>[ ide-scsi is orphaned and has (probably) unfixable problems
>  (because of having dependencies on both IDE and SCSI subsystems)
>  so it is not worth IMO but I will of course accept patches... ]

So, why is ide-scsi still in the tree? Is there some use case besides
cdrecord? (Which can use /dev/hda already without the ide-scsi blob...)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/