linux-kernel - Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080215153140.GN1178@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:31:40 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>, jdmason@...zu.us,
	bzolnier@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	discuss@...-64.org
Subject: Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe
> > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the
> > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device
> > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort.
> 
> After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree.  Thanks for
> the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :)

Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment
somewhere?

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/