[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B5BC35.1000700@mnsu.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:22:13 -0600
From: "Jeffrey E. Hundstad" <jeffrey.hundstad@...u.edu>
To: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@....muni.cz>
CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Disk schedulers
Lukas Hejtmanek,
I have to say, that I've heard this subject before, the summary answer
seems to be, that the kernel can not guess the wishes of the user 100%
of the time. If you have a low priority I/O task use ionice(1) to set
the priority of that task so it doesn't nuke your high priority task.
I have to personal stake in this answer but I can report that for my
high I/O tasks it does work like a charm.
--
Jeffrey Hundstad
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>> Also consider
>> - DMA (e.g. only UDMA2 selected)
>> - aging disk
>>
>
> it's not the case.
>
> hdparm reports udma5 is used, if it is reliable with libata.
>
> The disk is 3 months old, kernel does not report any errors. And it has never
> been different.
>
> --
> Lukáš Hejtmánek
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists