[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802151813480.30301@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:18:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make sysctl a separate filesystem
On Feb 15 2008 08:34, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> >
>> >Doing it automatically is the only acceptable way, IMO.
>>
>> For time being only.
>>
>> The kernel (currently) only auto-mounts invisible filesystems.
>
>like /root, sysfs, futexfs, pipefs, anon_inodefs, bdev, devpts,
>hugetlbfs, inotifyfs ?
Yes?
/ (double case - initramfs or kernel), sysfs, devpts and
hugetlbfs can be mounted using mount(8) (or mount(2)), so
userspace can - and distro scripts do just that - mount them.
futexfs, pipefs, anon_inodefs, bdev and inotifyfs are 'invisible'
filesystems in that you cannot mount them yourself and that you
do not usually get to see them except probably when readlink(2)ing
on /proc/X/fd/N.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists