[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080215180202.GA4356@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:02:02 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] do_group_exit: use signal_group_exit() more consistently
(hopefully this patch is simple enough for 2.6.25)
do_group_exit() checks SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT to avoid taking sighand->siglock.
Since ed5d2cac114202fe2978a9cbcab8f5032796d538 exec() doesn't set this flag,
we should use signal_group_exit().
This is not needed for correctness, but can speedup the multithreaded exec
and makes the code more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- 25/kernel/exit.c~5_DO_GROUP_EXIT 2008-02-15 16:59:17.000000000 +0300
+++ 25/kernel/exit.c 2008-02-15 20:27:18.000000000 +0300
@@ -1057,12 +1057,13 @@ asmlinkage long sys_exit(int error_code)
NORET_TYPE void
do_group_exit(int exit_code)
{
+ struct signal_struct *sig = current->signal;
+
BUG_ON(exit_code & 0x80); /* core dumps don't get here */
- if (current->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT)
- exit_code = current->signal->group_exit_code;
+ if (signal_group_exit(sig))
+ exit_code = sig->group_exit_code;
else if (!thread_group_empty(current)) {
- struct signal_struct *const sig = current->signal;
struct sighand_struct *const sighand = current->sighand;
spin_lock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
if (signal_group_exit(sig))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists