linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Respun LMB patches.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1203102337.6699.0.camel@concordia>
Date:	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:05:37 +1100
From:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Respun LMB patches.

On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 17:09 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> I've taken into consideration the various feedback, and
> ported the bug fix and other LMB patches posted recently
> in an effort to keep the patch churn by others down wrt.
> my moving of these files.
> 
> 1) Use HAVE_LMB as suggested by Sam.
> 
> 2) Fix potential build errors wrt. asm/prom.h dependencies.
> 
>    My algorithm was:
> 
>    a) If the file only included asm/lmb.h I added an include
>       of both linux/lmb.c and asm/prom.h
> 
>    b) If the file already includes asm/prom.h, I merely
>       changed the asm/lmb.h to linux/lmb.h

That fixes the build failures I was seeing, ack.

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)