[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43e72e890802151408g35fa2e49r5eb8557e4a5bbce4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:08:00 -0500
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>
To: "Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: linville@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org,
"Nick Kossifidis" <mickflemm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] WDEV, ath5k, don't return int from bool function
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> wrote:
> -static bool
> +static int
> ath5k_hw_setup_xr_tx_desc(struct ath5k_hw *ah, struct ath5k_desc *desc,
> unsigned int tx_rate1, u_int tx_tries1, u_int tx_rate2, u_int tx_tries2,
> unsigned int tx_rate3, u_int tx_tries3)
> @@ -3773,10 +3773,10 @@ ath5k_hw_setup_xr_tx_desc(struct ath5k_hw *ah, struct ath5k_desc *desc,
>
> #undef _XTX_TRIES
>
> - return true;
> + return 1;
> }
>
> - return false;
> + return 0;
> }
Shouldn't we then treat 0 as OK?
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists