[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440802151411k40dfc711g4965410bba11dc33@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:11:37 -0800
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> writes:
> >
> > [akpm@...ux-foundation.org: many fixes and cleanups]
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> > Tested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
>
> iirc it really was
> Tested-and-didnt-pass-test-by: Andi Kleen
> unfortunately. I have not rechecked recently, but on the one Intel
> box the original patch and the other mcfg heuristics removed didn't work.
it seems some intel system with old bios need
PATCH: Fix boot-time hang on G31/G33 PC
but greg decided not to use it, and user need to update BIOS or use pci=nommconf
but this one
x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources
should be different. it just reveres the BIOS bug.
Ingo,
Can you remove the line regarding Andi, and put them into x86 mm?
Andi could use pci=nommconf with that system with buggy BIOS or update the BIOS
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists