[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B61AD7.80902@tiscali.nl>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:05:59 +0100
From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, arjan@...radead.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Evolution in nature and changes in code are different because in code junk
>> and bugs are constantly removed. In biology junk is allowed and may provide
>> a pool for future development. Linux development is intended and not
>> survival.
>
> I would be interested to see any evidence (rather than intuition) to
> support that, given that both appear to be the same kind of structure and
> that structure is nowadays fairly well understood.
What do you mean with structure, the evolution? that both are a language?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists