lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B61DDF.4000302@tlinx.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800
From:	Linda Walsh <lkml@...nx.org>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86-32-config: why is pc-speaker an input device?

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> The last time around for this question, I was half-paying attention, and
> the rationale sounded like "We had an input device framework, no output
> device framework, and too many bad shrooms to do something comprehensible".
>   
---
    Yeah, hmm...the question I'd have then is the "only" output device 
that doesn't fit into a better category? 

    Could there be other OUTput devices in this category?   Would
renaming the category to something like "Miscellaneous I/O Devices" be
reasonable?    Are keyboard status lights considered output devices?
Are "force-feedback" devices meaning devices like a rumble-gamepad
device?  Isn't that providing output via feedback?

    Though, I would agree, most of these devices would be thought of
as "input" devices. Dang PC-SPEAKER...um...since the driver is config'ed
with the 'input' interface, dang, it really seems like it should be an
entry under sound.

    I can see the problem and I'm not familiar enough with the underlying
drivers to know how the PC-Speaker would best be handled. 

> (This is such a *frequent* FAQ, even all the time since 2.6.0 escaped, that
> maybe we need to add a 3-4 line explain to the Kconfig 'help' stanza for
> CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR - although for some reason, INPUT_SPARCSPKR and
> INPUT_M68K_BEEP don't seem to cause the same questions....)
>   
----
No matter where it is in the 'kernel configuration', it sure seems
strange (in "user land"), to see the PC-Speaker be recognized as an
input device -- especially in light of the fact that "all speakers
are microphones" (http://www.zyra.org.uk/sp-mic.htm).  Would some user
wonder whether or not their speaker has some dual-circuitry to listen
as well as output (ala TV sets being 2-way video devices in Max Headroom)?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ