[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B4FEBC.2020700@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:53:48 -0500
From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To: Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next build status
Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:24:27PM -0500, Chris Snook wrote:
>> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Initial status can be seen here
>>> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ (I hope to make a better
>>> URL soon). Suggestions for more compiler/config combinations are
>>> welcome, but we can't necessarily commit to fulfilling all you
>>> wishes. :-)
>>>
>> i386 allmodconfig please.
>
> Wont i386 allmodconfig be equivalent to x86_64 allmodconfig?
Only if there are no bugs.
Driver code is most likely to trip over bitness/endianness bugs, and
you've already got allmodconfig builds for be32, be64, and le64
architectures. Adding an le32 architecture (i386) completes the
coverage of these basic categories.
-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists