linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall (v8)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080214222103.a5d8f4fe.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:21:03 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	hch@...radead.org, serue@...ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall
 (v8)

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:36:16 +0100 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:

> Just documentation updates, compared to the previous submission.
> Thanks to Serge for the relentless reviews :)
> 
> Please consider for -mm, and then for 2.6.26.

Linus has just merged all the VFS renaming patches, so the decks
are clear for looking at this work.

However David and Christoph are beavering away on the r-o-bind-mounts
patches and I expect that there will be overlaps with unprivileged mounts.

Could we coordinate things a bit please?  Decide who goes first, review
and maybe even test each others work, etc?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/