[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080215164024.7fd356fa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:40:24 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dipankar@...ibm.com,
ego@...ibm.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove rcu_assign_pointer(NULL) penalty with
type/macro safety
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:00:24 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is an updated version of the patch posted last November:
>
> http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20071201.003721.cd6ff17c.en.html
>
> This new version permits arguments with side effects, for example:
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(global_p, p++);
>
> and also verifies that the arguments are pointers, while still avoiding
> the unnecessary memory barrier when assigning NULL to a pointer.
> This memory-barrier avoidance means that rcu_assign_pointer() is now only
> permitted for pointers (not array indexes), and so this version emits a
> compiler warning if the first argument is not a pointer. I built a "make
> allyesconfig" version on an x86 system, and received no such warnings.
> If RCU is ever applied to array indexes, then the second patch in this
> series should be applied, and the resulting rcu_assign_index() be used.
>
> Given the rather surprising history of subtlely broken implementations of
> rcu_assign_pointer(), I took the precaution of generating a full set of
> test cases and verified that memory barriers and compiler warnings were
> emitted when required. I guess it is the simple things that get you...
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> rcupdate.h | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.24/include/linux/rcupdate.h linux-2.6.24-rap/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> --- linux-2.6.24/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2008-01-24 14:58:37.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rap/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2008-02-13 13:36:47.000000000 -0800
> @@ -270,12 +270,20 @@ extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
> * structure after the pointer assignment. More importantly, this
> * call documents which pointers will be dereferenced by RCU read-side
> * code.
> + *
> + * Throws a compiler warning for non-pointer arguments.
> + *
> + * Does not insert a memory barrier for a NULL pointer.
> */
>
> -#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) ({ \
> - smp_wmb(); \
> - (p) = (v); \
> - })
> +#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
> + ({ \
> + typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (v); \
> + \
> + if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || (_________p1 != NULL)) \
> + smp_wmb(); \
> + (p) = _________p1; \
> + })
>
umm...
net/netfilter/core.c: In function 'nf_register_afinfo':
net/netfilter/core.c:39: warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
net/netfilter/nf_log.c: In function 'nf_log_register':
net/netfilter/nf_log.c:37: warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
net/netfilter/nf_queue.c: In function 'nf_register_queue_handler':
net/netfilter/nf_queue.c:38: warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists