linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/30] r/o bind mounts: stub functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1203122979.13230.3.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:49:39 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de, miklos@...redi.hu,
	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/30] r/o bind mounts: stub functions

On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 19:32 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:37:30PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > 
> > This patch adds two function mnt_want_write() and mnt_drop_write().
> > These are used like a lock pair around and fs operations that might
> > cause a write to the filesystem.
> 
> Argh, is there some reason why this couldn't have gotten merged in
> -rc1, ahead of the rest of the patch series?  This one is going to
> cause more cross-tree merge pain with any filesystem tree that have
> changes to fs/*/ioctl.c.

I wasn't meaning for this to hit the 2.6.25-rc series.  We had some
review comments just when the merge window opened, and I was expecting
them to get stuck back in -mm for another round.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/