lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080216.230232.25478328.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date:	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:02:32 +0900 (JST)
From:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: spi transfer with zero length

Hi.  Is it legal to use zero for 'len' field of struct spi_transfer?
I mean, len=0, tx_buf=rx_buf=NULL, delay_usecs!=0.

Some SPI devices need slightly long delay before first CLK edge after
CS assertion.  To achieve this, I think inserting using a zero length
transfer before real transfers.  But it seems some drivers do not
handle this case properly.

Is this driver's bug, or we need additional delay field in struct
spi_device for such case?

---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ