linux-kernel - Re: Disk schedulers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:13:10 +0100
From:	Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@....muni.cz>
To:	Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>
Cc:	Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disk schedulers

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Zan Lynx wrote:
> Yes, I see this often myself.  It's like the disk IO queue (I set mine
> to 1024) fills up, and pdflush and friends can stuff write requests into
> it much more quickly than any other programs can provide read requests.
> 
> CFQ and ionice work very well up until iostat shows average IO queuing
> above 1024 (where I set the queue number).

I though that CFQ would maintain IO queues per process and pick up request in
round robin from non-empty queues. Am I wrong? And if wrong, isn't it desired
behavior for desktop?

-- 
Lukáš Hejtmánek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/