linux-kernel - Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1203252147.31173.193.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:42:27 +0000
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, arjan@...radead.org,
	greg@...ah.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 12:24 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> Hm ... I think net is a counter example to this.  Rebases certainly work
> for them. 

That's a matter of opinion. 

I'm working on cleaning up the libertas driver as and when I have time,
and the constant rebasing of the git trees effectively means that I
can't just use git as it was intended; I feel that I'm being forced back
into the 1990s by having to deal with sequences of patches instead.

It's such a pain that I'm seriously tempted to push my changes directly
to Linus instead of through the subsystem maintainers.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/