[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080217173642.GC1403@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:36:42 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/hdsmart.h: fix goofups
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Sunday 17 February 2008, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > > Fix goofups of commit 76166952bbc81dda1c8a8c14e75a2aa06f6c052c
> > > ("<linux/hdsmart.h> is not used by kernel code").
> > >
> > > Reported-by: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/hdsmart.h | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: b/include/linux/hdsmart.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- a/include/linux/hdsmart.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/hdsmart.h
> > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> > > #ifndef _LINUX_HDSMART_H
> > > #define _LINUX_HDSMART_H
> > >
> > > -#ifndef __KERNEL
> > > +#ifndef __KERNEL__
> > > #define OFFLINE_FULL_SCAN 0
> > > #define SHORT_SELF_TEST 1
> > > #define EXTEND_SELF_TEST 2
> > > @@ -121,6 +121,6 @@ typedef struct ata_smart_selftestlog_s {
> > > unsigned char resevered[2];
> > > unsigned char chksum;
> > > } __attribute__ ((packed)) ata_smart_selftestlog_t;
> > > -#endif /* __KERNEL__ *
> > > +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> > >
> > > #endif /* _LINUX_HDSMART_H */
> >
> > if that header file isn't used by any kernel code, why bother having a
> > check for __KERNEL__ in the first place? it's being exported to
> > userspace unchecked:
> >
> > include/linux/Kbuild:header-y += hdsmart.h
> >
> > so why not just toss that check entirely? otherwise, you're going to
> > get a header file exported to userspace that has a superfluous
> > __KERNEL__ test in it.
>
> We don't want new (accidental etc.) kernel users of this header.
>...
Why can't we simply remove it?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists