[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080217194320.GL14588@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:43:20 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: setup_usemap() must be __meminit
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:31:14PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On m68k (CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is not set), I get:
> >
> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.meminit.text+0x36c): Section mismatch in reference from the function free_area_init_core() to the function .init.text:setup_usemap()
> > The function __meminit free_area_init_core() references
> > a function __init setup_usemap().
> > If free_area_init_core is only used by setup_usemap then
> > annotate free_area_init_core with a matching annotation.
> >
> > If CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is set, the problem is not noticed because setup_usemap()
> > is always inlined.
> >
> > Properly annotating setup_usemap() and usemap_size() fixes it.
>
> Woops, hit the send button too soon.
>
> setup_usemap() calls alloc_bootmem_node(), causing a whole new
> avalanche of warnings to be fixed up :-(
Something you like me to help with?
I would need a config where the mismatch triggers for one
of the more popular architectures (as in where I have a toolchain).
I could not reproduce it with x86 64bit - not even with -fno-inline-functions
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists